Legal Opinion

Richard Littke v. Laurie Littke

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 2013No. 64A03-1211-DR-509PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PYLE, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The post-dissolution proceedings resulting in this appeal arose between the legislature’s 2012 and 2013 amendments to Indiana Code § 31-16-6-6. In response to the 2012 amendment — which changed the presumptive age for termination of child support from twenty-one to nineteen — Laurie Littke (“Mother”) filed a motion to terminate child support for the parties’ nineteen-year-old child. Immediately thereafter, Richard Littke (“Father”) filed a petition for postsecondary educational expenses for the nineteen-year-old child. Mother then filed a motion to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunson v. DunsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Carr v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Annette (Oliver) Hirsch v. Roger Lee OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Donyel Perry v. Tracy PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API