Richard Littke v. Laurie Littke
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PYLE, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The post-dissolution proceedings resulting in this appeal arose between the legislature’s 2012 and 2013 amendments to Indiana Code § 31-16-6-6. In response to the 2012 amendment — which changed the presumptive age for termination of child support from twenty-one to nineteen — Laurie Littke (“Mother”) filed a motion to terminate child support for the parties’ nineteen-year-old child. Immediately thereafter, Richard Littke (“Father”) filed a petition for postsecondary educational expenses for the nineteen-year-old child. Mother then filed a motion to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dunson v. DunsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Carr v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Annette (Oliver) Hirsch v. Roger Lee OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donyel Perry v. Tracy PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013