Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 31, 1968No. 43667PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. Knowledge that the instrument is forged is an essential ingredient of the crime of uttering a forged instrument. Code Ann. § 26-3910 (Cobb, 803; Ga. L. 1959, pp. 252, 253); Couch v. State, 28 Ga. 367; Stephens v. State, 56 Ga. 604; Rowland v. State, 90 Ga. App. 742, 743 (84 SE2d 209), and cit.

2. Where the jury found the defendant not guilty of forgery of a check in spite of the testimony of a handwriting expert that the endorsement on the check was made by the defendant, *828where the only evidence that the check is a forgery is the bank’s marking thereon, “Unable to locate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Couch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  2. Rowland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arthur v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API