State Ex Rel . Wells v. . Sluder .
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil AotioN, heretofore before this Court, and reported in 70 N. C. Rep., 55, and sent back to the Superior Court of BuNcombb to have the judgment then appealed from modified, again heard before Henry, Ji, at the Fall Term, 1874, of said Court.
Read the full summary
Civil AotioN, heretofore before this Court, and reported in 70 N. C. Rep., 55, and sent back to the Superior Court of BuNcombb to have the judgment then appealed from modified, again heard before Henry, Ji, at the Fall Term, 1874, of said Court. The following statement, signed by the counsel, is sent to this term, as presenting the points for adjudication, or for the proper construction to be given to the decision heretofore rendered, to-wit, at January Term, 1874. 1 At Fall Term, 1874, of Buncombe Superior Court, a judgment for $1,185.64, was obtained by agreement, in favor of the plaintiff…
1Opinion of the CourtSettle, J.
This is a case agreed, for the purpose of obtaining a proper construction of the opinion of this Court, rendered at January Term, 1814, in a case between the same parties, and reported in 70 N. C. Rep. 55.
The only question before us now is whether the defendants are to be charged with the value of the Confederate money received on the Ratty debt, at the date of its receipt, or with the full amount of the Patty note %
"When the case was first before us this question was not discussed, indeed it was not even suggested on the argument, and in rendering the opinion the Court was looking only to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel . Cummings v. . MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- Shipp, Ex'r v. . HettrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robertson v. . WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881