Legal Opinion
Claim of Johnson v. Moog, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 10, 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Mahoney, P. J.
Appeal from an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 21, 1984, which ruled that the employer did not discriminate against claimant in violation of Workers’ Compensation Law §241.
Claimant was discharged from his employment on July 27, 1979 because of excessive absenteeism. On this appeal, claimant contends that he was fired because he attempted to file a claim for disability benefits and, therefore, his discharge was a discriminatory act in violation of Workers’ Compensation Law §241.
Claimant had a high rate of absenteeism from work throughout his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Duncan v. New York State Developmental CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Claim of Wiltshire v.Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Claim of Solomon v. Cohn, Glickstein, Lurie, Ostrin & LubellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Claim of Lawrence v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Warden v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Ribar v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Claim of McQueen v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Claim of Coleman v. Compass Group USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.