State v. Stuckey
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
¶ 1. Wisconsin Stat. § 948.10(l)(a) (2011-12)1 establishes that it is a Class I felony when one exposes genitals to a child "for purposes of sexual arousal or sexual gratification." An example of the type of actor targeted by this statute is the sexual pervert who exposes himself to a child in a park. The twist in this case is that the State charged Zachary Stuckey with violating this statute by taking a picture of his penis and then sending the picture via the internet (colloquially known as "sexting") to a fourteen-year-old girl. Stuckey moved to dismiss this charge, arguing that § 948.10…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. TrochinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ThielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WeidnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.