Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Schwabe
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided May 9, 1960No. 47477PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COIL, Commissioner.
Respondents Louis and Mary Noble were defendants in a condemnation proceedings instituted by the State Highway Commission. In Count 2 of their amended counterclaim they sought the reformation of a deed by which they had conveyed real estate to the State of Missouri. The trial chancellor found that the deed in question did not reserve a right of access to Highway 40 but that, as contended by respondents, such reservation had been omitted as a result of mutual mistake, and adjudged that the deed be reformed to include such reservation. The State Highway Commission…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Walters v. TuckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Dalton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Simmons v. FridaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Aquamsi Land Co. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Allen v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Rentenbach Engineering Co., Construction Division v. General Realty Ltd.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- Cardinal Partners, LLC v. Desco Investment Co., L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Galemore v. HaleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Herhalser v. HerhalserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.