Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Hoffman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1928No. 12,633PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilloughby, J.

The appellee recovered a judgment against the appellant in an action for personal injuries. The complaint was in two paragraphs, each charging the appellant with actionable negligence. These paragraphs of complaint were answered by a verified general denial to each of said paragraphs. The issue thus formed was tried by a jury, resulting in a verdict against the appellant and in favor of appellee, and assessing her damages at the sum of $4,500, upon which verdict the court rendered judgment in favor of appellee and against the appellant for said amount. From such judgment, this appeal is being…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Durousseau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  4. Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re Petitions to Transfer Appeals From Appellate Court to Supreme CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Campbell v. Criterion GroupIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Campbell v. Criterion GroupIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Lovett v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API