Fluehr v. City of Cape May
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentO’Hern, J.
The Tort Claims Act (TCA), N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 14-4, allows recovery against public employees and public entities when the claim is based on the negligent supervision of recreational activities. A slim but triable issue of fact was presented here concerning whether Cape May’s lifeguards were negligent in their supervision of the City’s beach. I would therefore affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division allowing the claim to proceed. I would *558do so substantially for the reasons stated in its comprehensive opinion:
We agree with the motion judge that the beach and the ocean are unimproved…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Willis v. Department of Conservation & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Kolitch v. LindedahlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Rochinsky v. State of NJ, Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Tice v. CramerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.