Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fluehr v. City of Cape May

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 26, 1999Published

1DissentO’Hern, J.

The Tort Claims Act (TCA), N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 14-4, allows recovery against public employees and public entities when the claim is based on the negligent supervision of recreational activities. A slim but triable issue of fact was presented here concerning whether Cape May’s lifeguards were negligent in their supervision of the City’s beach. I would therefore affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division allowing the claim to proceed. I would *558do so substantially for the reasons stated in its comprehensive opinion:

We agree with the motion judge that the beach and the ocean are unimproved…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Willis v. Department of Conservation & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Kolitch v. LindedahlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Rochinsky v. State of NJ, Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Tice v. CramerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API