Legal Opinion

Brendese v. City of Schenectady

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtImrie, J.

Plaintiff seeks judgment declaring that Ms several bids submitted to defendant city October 2, 1946, for eleven different items of sanitary sewer construction and totaling somewhat over $98,000 be rescinded, cancelled and declared null and void and of no effect; also, perpetually enjoining the defendants from declaring the plaintiff in default and from declaring his certified checks deposited with Ms bids in the amount of $5,000 forfeit, and directing the return of said checks to the plaintiff or payment to him of a like amount.

Following public advertising for bids for the public improvements…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Little v. . BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Clement v. . CashNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Abner M. Harper, Inc. v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Balaban-Gordon Co. v. Brighton Sewer District No. 2Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. Frank W. O'Connell, Inc. v. County of BroomeNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Stage v. WhitehouseNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Wholesale Service Supply Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API