State v. Eller
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant contends that the court erred in allowing the State to introduce as evidence the material seized pursuant to the search of defendant’s home on 22 April 1977. He alleges that the facts presented to the magistrate were not sufficient as a matter of law to support a finding of probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant. To be sufficient, an application must set forth facts and circumstances from which the magistrate can judge the validity of the informant’s conclusion that the evidence sought is at the indicated place and facts and circumstances from which the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. . BrackettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. FlippinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980