Supina v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction is for sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.
The defense in this case was that of alibi. The appellant’s wife and his brother testified that he was not present at the time of the alleged sale.
From the charge of the court we make the following quotation:
“Now, if the evidence raises in your mind a reasonable doubt as to the presence of the defendant at the place where the offense was committed, at the time of the commission thereof, you will find the defendant not guilty.”
This was excepted to upon the ground that it assumed as a fact…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Briscoe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Hines, Alias Burton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- McLeroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Marlow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- State v. HannaUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Johns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.