Legal Opinion

O'NEAL v. United States

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 30, 1985No. Civ. F 84-191PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition to quash an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) summons issued to the General Telephone Company (“GTE”). For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss will be granted.

Petitioners are proceeding pro se. Pro se pleadings are to be liberally construed. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972). The district court’s role is to ensure that the claims of pro se litigants are given “fair and meaningful consideration.” Matzker v. Herr, 748 F.2d 1142 at 1146 (7th…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Robert F. Christensen and Eileen F. Christensen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2002
  3. Lassa v. RongstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Vermont Ass'n of Realtors, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. Collins v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API