Legal Opinion

Dolan v. State Board of Law Examiners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1992No. C0-90-2106PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

Paul Dolan requests, for the second time, that this court reverse the Minnesota Board of Law Examiner’s denial of his admission to practice law in Minnesota. The factual background of his case is set forth in our opinion issued subsequent to Dolan’s first appeal to the court. In re Dolan, 445 N.W.2d 553 (Minn.1989).

Dolan’s application for admission to practice law in Minnesota was denied by the Board of Law Examiners (Board) on the basis that he did not receive his law degree from an American Bar Association (ABA) accredited law school. Graduation from an ABA…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. In Re ZbiegienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Petition of BuschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Petition of DolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Petition of BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Matter of Bar Admission of AltshulerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Matter of Bar Admission of AltshulerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In re MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API