People v. Sommerville
New York Court of Special Session
1Opinion of the Court
McKennell,
Acting City Judge. The information in this case charges that defendant violated section 50 of article 4 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law in that she, as an employer of labor, in the conduct of a “ beauty parlor ” (which is alleged to be a hazardous employment as defined in group 12 of subdivision 1 of section 3 of that act), failed to secure compensation to her employees, for injuries sustained or,death incurred, by not insuring the payment of such compensation by any of the means provided in the requirements of section 50 of article 4 of the statute.
The facts are conceded.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Schmidt v. . BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Matter of Rice v. StonehamNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Maloney v. Levy & Gilliland Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. Garford Laboratories, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1939