Legal Opinion

Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. Worrall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

— On the 7th day of July, 1875, the Wheeler and Wilson Manufacturing Company and Isaac D. Worrall entered into an agreement in writing, by which the said Worrall was made the agent for the sale and lease of the company’s sewing machines in the county of Monroe, and other counties, at certain specified rates of commission on sales or leases, the sales to be for cash, or for good notes, under rules and regulations prescribed in the agreement. The agreement "contained numerous conditions and stipulations.

The fifth stipulation contained a provision that the' company',"'known as the party of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Friddle v. CraneIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Higert v. Trustees of Indiana Asbury UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Kent v. CantrallIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Deutsch v. KorsmeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Downey v. WhittenbergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stanton v. KenrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Catterlin v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Douthit v. MohrIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. McAfee v. BendingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Baldwin v. BoyceIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API