Legal Opinion

In Re Fonke

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 1, 2005No. 14-10054PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MARVIN ISGUR, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Court finds that the deadline to object to exemptions does not recommence when a case under chapter 13 is converted to a case under chapter 7.

Background

The facts of this case are undisputed. Ronald Fonke (the “Debtor”) filed a voluntary petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code on August 7, 2003. The Debtor properly filed his list of exempt property. Neither the chapter 13 trustee nor any creditor objected. This case was converted to chapter 7 on June 10, 2004, [Docket no. 79] 1 and a chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”) was appointed…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Commissioner v. TuftsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re BaceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. In Re QuillenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  3. In re ReevesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
  4. Lowe v. DeBerry (In Re DeBerry)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Wiggins v. Frank (In Re Wiggins)District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API