Legal Opinion

Victor D. Denenburg and Wife, Sandra J. Denenburg v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 30, 1991No. 90-2257PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Victor D. Denenburg (Taxpayer), and his wife, Sandra J. Denenburg, plaintiffs-appellants, paid penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (I.R.C.) § 6651, 1 for late filing of personal income tax returns for 1978 and 1979, then filed this suit in district court seeking refund of those penalties. The government filed a motion for summary judgment which the district court granted after finding that the accounting advice relied on by the Taxpayer and his wife did not constitute “reasonable cause” under I.R.C. §…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kenneth Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Southmark Properties and St. Charles Avenue, Inc. v. The Charles House CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Haywood Lumber & Mining Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of La Meres v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  2. United States v. Red Stripe, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  3. Estate of Cavenaugh v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  4. Stanford v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
  5. United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API