Legal Opinion
Arthur Earl Robbins v. Glenn R. Thomas, Parole Agent, and United States Board of Parole
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1979No. 78-2164PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal presents the narrow issue of what procedure the United States Parole Commission should follow when events casting doubt on the advisability of terminating parole occur between a parole termination hearing and the issuance of a final decision based on that hearing. We hold that, in this circumstance, the requirements of procedural due process and of the applicable statutes are satisfied if the Parole Commission reopens the case and orders a supplemental hearing at which the parolee is accorded the same procedural rights as at other parole termination hearings. The Parole Commission…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Robert J. Andrino v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Lee Autry Robinson v. C. L. Benson, Warden, Leavenworth Federal PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Arthur Earl Robbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- George I. Benny v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States of America Ex Rel. Robert Pullia v. Dennis Luther, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- James J. Valona v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Russ v. PerrillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Little v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.