Morris v. Hanson

On the 26th day of August, 1889, Andrew Hanson, defendant herein, instituted his action for the recovery of certain personal property of the alleged value of $200 against plaintiff in error, George Morris. Affidavit and bond was filed and thereafter writ of replevin issued. It appears from the record that the bond was signed by the plaintiff and one surety. On the 4th of September, 1889, Morris filed a motion to dismiss the action for want of sufficient bond, and before hearing of said motion he filed his answer to which the plaintiff replied.

The motion to dismiss was overruled, and the cause…