Legal Opinion

Jones v. Doonan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1933No. Calendar 37,090PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is certiorari to review mandamus proceedings. Both parties appeal but defendants are content with the judgment of circuit court.

Plaintiff, a policeman of the city of Dearborn since 1925, was suspended by the chief of police on August 26, 1929, because he had been arrested on a charge of rape. The next day he was notified by a police lieutenant that the commission of safety would meet in the evening as a trial board, charges would be preferred against plaintiff in relation to the rape complaint and he would have an opportunity to defend himself. Plaintiff stated he would not appear before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Phillips v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Cote v. City of BiddefordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
  4. McComb v. Lansing City CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Layle v. ADJUTANT GEN. OF MICH.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney ex rel. Taxpayers v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Lenz v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Brown v. Department of Military AffairsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API