Dunhill Mfg. & Dist. Corp. v. State Park Commission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.
We believe the disposition of Special Term should be affirmed, though not specifically on the grounds stated.
Petitioners were business tenants on property condemned by the State in eminent domain proceedings. Petitioner made an application to the respondent State Park Commission for the City of New York for moving expenses, alleging those expenses to be $63,517.01. Title vested in the State on July 7,1969. Petitioner moved over a period of several days beginning. June 2, Í970. The statute (Conservation Law, § 676-a), providing for moving expenses for a tenant of condemned property, as it read…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Saumell v. New York Racing Ass'n, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Beth Rifka, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Terranova v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976