Legal Opinion

Ex parte Toscano

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 5, 1913No. 659PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition of Higinio Toscano and others for writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

WEUDBORN, District Judge.

Petitioners, 208 in number, and the respondent have stipulated on this hearing the following facts;

"That since the early part of March, 1913, a state of civil war has existed in the republic of Mexico, and particularly in that part which is contiguous to the United States, and that one of the parties to this civil war is known as the Federalists, and the other party 3s known as the Constitutionalists, and that both the Federalists and the Constitutionalists have raised large numbers of troops, and armed and equipped them and formed them into a military organization,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wong Wing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. In Re NeagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Foster v. NeilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  4. The Brig Amy WarwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  5. Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aerovias Interamericanas De Panama, S.A. v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1961
  2. United States ex rel. Martinez-Angosto v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. United States v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API