Legal Opinion

Scott v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 25, 1995No. A95A1516Published

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

This case is before us on appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to John E. McDonald. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that no agency relationship existed between Bobby Ray McDonald and John McDonald because Bobby Ray was an independent contractor. We affirm the order of the trial court.

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. McDaniel v. Peterborough Cablevision, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. N. S. Co. v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API