Ashbrook v. State

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

Counsel for plaintiff in error stated during the trial that the confession of the plaintiff in error was “uncontradicted.” In their brief, they state:

“We respectfully submit that the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas should be reversed, not because we contended in that court, nor do we now, that the defendant is not guilty of homicide, but because a number of errors were committed by the Nisi Prius Court, both at the; trial and in overruling the motion for a new trial, and) that certain conduct was indulged in by the assistant county prosecuting attorney of Hamilton…