In Re Mutual Fund Sales Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before ALFRED P. MURRAH * , Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER*, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.
In December 1972 plaintiff Haddad filed a treble damage action in the District of Columbia alleging that defendants had violated the federal antitrust laws by combining and conspiring to restrain trade in the purchase and sale of mutual fund securities; to keep the prices of such securities at artificial and non-competitive levels; and to prevent the development of secondary dealer and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
- In Re Career Academy Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
- In Re Ampicillin Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- In Re Public Air Travel Tariff LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Toilet Seat Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- In Re Clinton Oil Company Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973