Legal Opinion

In Re Mutual Fund Sales Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided July 25, 1973No. 135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH * , Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER*, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.

In December 1972 plaintiff Haddad filed a treble damage action in the District of Columbia alleging that defendants had violated the federal antitrust laws by combining and conspiring to restrain trade in the purchase and sale of mutual fund securities; to keep the prices of such securities at artificial and non-competitive levels; and to prevent the development of secondary dealer and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
  2. In Re Career Academy Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
  3. In Re Ampicillin Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
  4. In Re Public Air Travel Tariff LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Toilet Seat Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
  2. In Re Clinton Oil Company Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API