Legal Opinion

Civilian Defense, Inc. v. Ross

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1958No. 5801PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT.

This is a law appeal from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court sustaining a demurrer to each of the causes of action set forth in the 4th amended petition and to each cause of action in the 4th amended cross-petition' of Charles R. Ross and Marion A. Ross and denying further right to amend for the reason that the defects in said pleadings cannot be remedied.

The action is one seeking to enjoin the defendants, Ryan, et al., from interfering with the petitioner’s and cross-petitioners’ use of a way of ingress and egress to their property over that of the Ryans, defendants…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Toledo v. Perry's Landing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Phyllis Ann Thropp v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Incorporated v. Jack A. Thropp, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Monroe Bowling Lanes v. Woodsfield Livestock SalesOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Methonen v. StoneAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re Penn-Dixie Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API