Legal Opinion

Coonradt v. Myers

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action brought by Coonradt and another, against Myers, to recover damages for an alleged trespass upon certain real estate. Trial at the October Term, 1879, of the Miami district court, and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiffs bring the case to this court.

1Per curiam

This was an action brought by Coonradt and Ball against Myers, to recover damages for an. alleged trespass upon real estate. As to who owned the real estate, the record does not show; probably the defendant owned it. The plaintiffs did not introduce any evidence (further than proof as to their posession) tending to show that they or either of them owned it. The real question litigated by the parties was: Who had the actual possession of the property? That *314was a question of fact, and it was heard upon oral evidence. Each side introduced sufficient evidence to show (in the absence of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winstead v. StandefordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Myers v. CoonradtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Coonradt v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Coonradt v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API