Legal Opinion

Romans v. Romans

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1961No. 39156PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Vice Chief Justice.

This appeal involves the trial court’s allowance of an attorney fee to Mr. Fred W. Woodson, who appeared in the trial court •as attorney of record for the defendant in •error, the plaintiff in error’s wife, who was ■plaintiff in this uncontested divorce action, •and will hereinafter be referred to by that ■designation. Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, engaged no separate counsel to contest his wife’s petition •for divorce, but he was present in person in the court room on November 20, 1959, when the trial court received plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Company v. MerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. McElreath v. McElreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Helvey v. HelveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Amsey v. AmseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Remy v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Wilbanks v. WilbanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Longmire v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Selby v. SelbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API