Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Montgomery Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1987No. 498PA86Published

1Opinion of the Court

360 S.E.2d 772 (1987)

320 N.C. 669

Jerry W. DANIELS

v.

MONTGOMERY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 498PA86.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 7, 1987.

Brinkley, Walser, McGirt, Miller, Smith & Coles by Stephen W. Coles and Charles H. McGirt, and Wilson, Biesecker, Tripp & Sink by Joe E. Biesecker, Lexington, for plaintiff-appellee.

Yates, Fleishman, McLamb & Weyher by Joseph W. Yates, III, and Barbara B. Weyher, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

FRYE, Justice.

In this case, we consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly decided: (1) that a trial court may, as an alternative to granting a motion…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Sam ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Daniels v. Montgomery Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Feibus & Co., Inc. v. Godley Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API