Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Gabor
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MacMAHON, District Judge.
The question here is whether the parties have substituted private licensing agreements for the protections afforded them by Section 1(e) of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.A. § 1(e). Relying on Edward B. Marks Music Corp. v. Foullon, 171 F.2d 905 (2 Cir. 1949), defendant moves to dismiss the complaint or for summary judgment, contending that plaintiffs have substituted private licensing agreements for their statutory rights and obligations.
The documents in question describe themselves as agreements and licenses and contain variations from the compulsory license…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- H. M. Kolbe Co. v. ShaffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Norbay Music, Inc. v. King Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Edward B. Marks Music Corporation v. FoullonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Joy Music, Inc. v. Seeco Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rohauer v. Killiam Shows, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Harry Fox Agency, Inc. v. Mills Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Peer International Corp. v. Latin American Music Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001
- Essex Music, Inc. v. ABKCO Music & Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Warner Bros.-Seven Arts, Inc. v. KalantzakisDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.