Legal Opinion
Hendrix v. Williams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: The determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 180.11 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [26] [ii]) is not supported by substantial evidence. Petitioner’s receipt of correspondence from another inmate’s aunt does not violate any of the policies and procedures governing the inmate correspondence program (see, 7 NYCRR part 720; cf., Matter of Montgomery v Jones, 88 AD2d 1003). Substantial evidence is also lacking to support the determination that petitioner violáted inmate rule…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Montgomery v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Tate v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Rivera v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- McAllister v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Bartley v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Cliff v. TedfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hynes v. GirdichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Collins v. PearlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003