F. W. Woolworth Co. v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The defendant, F. W. Woolworth Company, a corporation, was charged in the county court of Canadian county with the crime of selling two pints of a liquid compound known as “bay rum,” alleged to be a substitute for malt, vinous, fermented, and spirituous, liquors, and capable of being used as a beverage; was tried, convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine of $200, from which judgment an appeal has been taken to this court.
There are many assignments of error, but they may be all considered under the general assignment that the court erred in refusing to advise the jury to return a verdict of not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Carl v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- State v. LafferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Brethren Mutual Insurance Company v. Jai Dev, IncDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023
- Cox v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Opinion No. 37-79 (1979), Missouri Attorney General Reports1979
- Opinion No. 68-373 (1969) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1969