Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Bottone
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1959No. 6586PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGHEE, Justice.
The controversy before us arose from appellant’s appeal from another case in which he was a defendant in the Small Claims Court. After judgment was rendered against appellant in that case he filed an appeal to the District Court and under the provisions of section 16-5-12, 1953 N.M.S.A., applied for a court proceedings-bond to be issued by the appellee here, Royal Indemnity Company, to secure the costs of that appeal.
When the transcript of the record was completed, appellant became involved in a dispute with the clerk-reporter of the Small Claims Court who prepared the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Department of Banking v. HedgesNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Counelis v. CounelisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Huffman v. National Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Ferris v. Independence Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Dusbabek v. BowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moya v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Moya v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965