Magalski v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, C. J.
I
Once again we are urged by an unhappy litigant to encroach on the legislative prerogative. Once again we decline to do so. Even in those instances where the result sought appears salutary, we are cautious not to enact legislation under the guise of judicial review of legislative acts, for in so doing the fundamental constitutional concept of the separation of powers is eroded. Fundamentally, the office of a judge is jus dicere, not jus dare; the judge “. . . is not delegated to pronounce a new law, but to maintain and expound the old one.” 1 Blackstone, Commentaries on the Law, 69. 1 And, as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Shillman v. HobstetterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- State v. SiegelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Tullgren v. JasperDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- City of Salisbury v. Banker's Life Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974