Legal Opinion

Holtzapfel v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1981No. Appeal, No. 1558 C.D. 1980Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Claimant appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying benefits to Claimant for noncompliance with Section 108 (n) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Section 1 of the Act of October 17, 1972, P.L. 930, 77 P.S. §27.1 (n).1 We affirm the Board’s order.

After having worked five years as a utility plant operator, Claimant reported to his physician in order to be treated for shortness of breath. Subsequently, Claimant was hospitalized and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crucible Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. McHale v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Colt Industries v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Gallo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Crucible Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API