State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Connor

Nebraska Advance Sheets 660 289 NEBRASKA REPORTS CONCLUSION For the reasons explained above, O’Brien failed to present evidence of a genuine issue of material fact that the permis- sible reason of poor job performance articulated by BPS for his termination was a pretext; therefore, BPS is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Court of Appeals did not err when it affirmed the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of BPS. Affirmed. State of Nebraska ex rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court, relator, v. James E. Connor, respondent. ___ N.W.2d ___…