Seifert v. Sheppard, Knapp & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Nottingham. City court of Macon. March term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.
1. When it is impossible to determine from the allegations of a petition, taken all together, whether the plaintiffs seek to recover from the defendant on the theory that as executrix de son tort she has converted to her own use personal goods of an intestate ; or on the theory that she *815is liable for the value of the goods because the decedent as her agent purchased them from the plaintiffs for her, without disclosing his agency ; or upon still another theory, that she is liable for the price of the goods because she has in writing promised to pay the same, such petition is bad for duplicity,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pitts v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Orr v. CooledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Adams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Mount v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. InabinetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.