Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Mrozek
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 26, 1995PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed upon appellant after he was convicted of first degree murder in a jury trial. Appellant raises several issues for our review, including whether the court erred in allowing testimony of his attorney’s secretary regarding an inculpatory statement he made to her when he called to enlist the aid of his attorney regarding the impending homicide charges upon which he was eventually convicted. We vacate and remand.
The charges in question stem from the killing of Danette Ritz in the early morning hours of July 3, 1990. Responding to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- People v. KnippenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Commonwealth v. HutchinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Hurt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Karoly v. MancusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Com. v. Lehman, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Red Vision Systems, Inc. v. National Real Estate Information Services, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Mueller v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.