Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1988No. 87-826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The primary issue presented in this action is whether an arbitrator called as a favorable witness *238by a party for the purposes of cross-examination pursuant to R.C. 2711. 21(D) is subject to further questioning as an adverse witness by any opposing party. We hold in the affirmative and, accordingly, reverse the decision of the court of appeals and remand this action for a new trial.

R.C. 2711.21(C) and (D) provide:

“(C) If the decision of the arbitration board is not accepted by all parties thereto, the pleadings shall be amended to aver both the fact that the controversy was submitted to an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beatty v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Lucero v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2011
  3. Nicholson v. LandisOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API