Legal Opinion
(PS) Aussieker v. Staccato Properties, LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 26, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00089Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK AUSSIEKER and KIMBERLY No. 2:19-cv-0089 TLN DB PS AUSSIEKER, 12 13 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 v. 15 STACCATO PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs Mark Aussieker and Kimberly Aussieker are proceeding in this action pro se. 19 This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for default judgement against 21 defendant Staccato Properties, LLC,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Curtis B. Danning, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Fenton, Lavine & Co., a Partnership v. Beau Berlinski LavineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.