Riddle & Co. v. Mandeville & Jamesson
Supreme Court of the United States
Nothing having been said respecting the costs, the court below had . not issued execution- for the costs of the appellant.
Read the full summary
Nothing having been said respecting the costs, the court below had . not issued execution- for the costs of the appellant. A MANDATE had been issued upon the reversal of the decree in' this case at the last term, in which, « this court, proceeding-to give such, decree as the said circuit court ought to have given, doth decree and order, that the defendants pay to. the plaintiffs the sum °f 1,500 dollars, that being the amount of the note in the bill mentioned, together with interest thereon from the time the same became due, you are hereby commanded, that such execution-and proceedings be had…
1Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Ch. J.
The court below, is always competent to award costs in a chancery suit iti-that court, and, m case of a mandate, may issue execution herefor.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Riddle and Company v. Mandeville and JamessonSupreme Court of the United States · 1810