Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1981No. 14198, 80-26PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of aiding and abetting another in the practice of the healing art without a license, in violation of D.C.Code 1973, §§ 2-102, 22-105. Section 2-102 provides in relevant part:

No person shall practice the healing art in the District of Columbia who is not . .. licensed so to do.. . .

Appellant was convicted of aiding and abetting a licensed paramedical assistant employed by him. An implied exception to the proscriptions of § 2-102 is contained in D.C.Code 1978 Supp., § 2-123(d)(10), which provides:

[Professional misconduct . . .…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ReedColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Bsharah v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. WhaleyColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Headspeth v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API