Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Town of Seekonk

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 14, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.

The plaintiffs seek in this bill in equity to abate an alleged nuisance caused by the stabling of a horse by the defendants Brassard, their neighbors, in a residence district in Seekonk, and seek also to order the selectmen of that town, acting as the board of health, to revoke a permit to stable the horse, allegedly granted in violation of the zoning by-law. There was a master’s report which was confirmed by an interlocutory decree, followed by a final decree which dismissed the bill of complaint. The plaintiffs appeal from the final decree.

1. Whether a nuisance existed was a question of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. Board of Appeals of WestportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Foot v. BaumanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  3. Woods v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Atherton v. Selectmen of BourneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Scudder v. Selectmen of SandwichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blanchette v. BlanchetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Morganelli v. Building Inspector of CantonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. Flynn v. BrassardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  4. Hebb v. LamportMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  5. Onorati v. O'DonnellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API