Legal Opinion

Cormier's Case

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 6, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrill, J.

The claimant was injured while employed by Allen Quimby Company in hauling logs to its mill-yard in Stockholm. Allen Quimby Company manufactures veneer; another corporation, Allen Quimby Clothespin Company, has a mill near by; these corporations jointly carry on woods operations for the supply of lumber to their mills, although it appears that the hauling from the camp about six miles distant is paid for by the corporation at whose mill the stock is unloaded. On the day in question Cormier was employed in hauling timber, cut into lengths six feet long, from the camp to the mill-yard of Allen…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. LeClair v. WallingfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. McDannellAdams County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API