Donley v. Donley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion, made at the close of plaintiffs proof, to dismiss the complaint in this action seeking a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. To be entitled to a judgment of divorce on that ground, "plaintiff [is] required to establish serious misconduct on the part of defendant such that [her] physical or mental well being was endangered and continued cohabitation with defendant was unsafe or improper” (Urtis v Urtis, 181 AD2d 1001, 1002; see,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Doyle v. DoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Urtis v. UrtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Brooks v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Walczak v. WalcZakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tissot v. TissotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Vaiana v. VaianaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Quaedvlieg v. QuaedvliegNew York Supreme Court · 1999