Portland Cremation Asso. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Amount set aside by petitioner for perpetual care of niches, urns, and valuts held to be within gross income.
1Opinion of the Court
*68OPINION.
Sterni-iagen :
All the facts are stipulated, and thus the Board is limited precisely in the scope of its consideration. It is contended that a commercial cremation corporation, by voluntarily setting aside a reserve called a “ maintenance fund ” for the purpose of performing some of its ordinary contractual obligations the actual cost of which is not known, which fund is so free from outside constraint that the corporation may “ borrow ” from it at will and so far as appears may limit its amount at will, has created a trust, itself the trustee. It is not an express trust, so it must be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bourland v. Springdale Cemetery Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
- Memphis Memorial Park v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
- Meadowlawn Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Hawaiian Cemetery Asso. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
- Cedar Park Cemetery Ass'n, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.