Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bud Anderson Heating & Cooling, Inc. v. Mike Neil & Absolute Hvac, LLC

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 7, 2018No. CV–17–683Published

1DissentKenneth S. Hixson, Judge

I am not particularly fond of the doctrine of mootness; however, the Arkansas Supreme Court has historically adopted and employed mootness since at least 1860 and continues to do so. The underlying principle of mootness is that appellate courts do not give advisory opinions. It has been said many times that a case becomes moot when any judgment rendered would have no practical legal effect upon a then existing legal controversy. State v. First Serv. Bank of Greenbrier , 2013 Ark. 101, 2013 WL 842241. While the 1860 supreme court in State v. Jones , 22 Ark. 331, 1860 WL 834 (1860), did not use…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc. v. VromanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Stoddard v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Duffner v. AlbertyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API