Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1992No. A054047PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MERRILL, J.

This case raises the issue of whether there is a conflict in the drunk driving provisions of the Vehicle Code 1 between recently enacted administrative per se laws mandating the suspension of driving privileges of second offenders for a period of one year (§§ 13353.2 & 13353.3, subd. (b)(2)) and preexisting second-offender probation statutes providing for a restricted driver’s license (§§ 23165, 23166, 13352, subd. (a)(3), & 13352.5, subd. (a)). Contending that there is such a conflict, Larry Robertson petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate to set aside an order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Peretto v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fearn v. ZolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Joseph v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. LaChance v. ValverdeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. McDaniel v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API