Robertson v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
This case raises the issue of whether there is a conflict in the drunk driving provisions of the Vehicle Code 1 between recently enacted administrative per se laws mandating the suspension of driving privileges of second offenders for a period of one year (§§ 13353.2 & 13353.3, subd. (b)(2)) and preexisting second-offender probation statutes providing for a restricted driver’s license (§§ 23165, 23166, 13352, subd. (a)(3), & 13352.5, subd. (a)). Contending that there is such a conflict, Larry Robertson petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate to set aside an order…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Peretto v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Fearn v. ZolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Joseph v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- LaChance v. ValverdeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- McDaniel v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.