Harrington v. State

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

MORRISON, Judge.

Appellant takes this Court to task for holding that there was no showing that the jury who tried him came from the jury *244wheel which he claims was improperly filled. He calls our attention to the fact that the voir dire examination of the prospective jurors began as soon as the hearing on the motion to quash the panel was concluded. He contends this is sufficient without further identification to demonstrate that the jury which tried him came from the “infected” jury wheel.

At the hearing on the said motion to quash there was evidence…