Legal Opinion

State v. Friedman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 9, 1978No. [No. 32, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The issue that we determine to be dispositive of this appeal can be succinctly stated: Was it proper here for the trial court to fix priorities among competing claimants to a fund that was established in connection with the attachment on original process portion of these proceedings before adjudicating the cause of action set out in the declaration? Because we conclude that the matter was unripe for decision when the court order establishing priorities was signed, we reverse and remand the case for further proceedings.

Although the parties are in sharp disagreement as to the legal principles…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of EmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Barry Properties v. Fick Bros. Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Phillips v. KrakowerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  4. Marburg v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  5. Jordan v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sumy v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. Beall v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Arbesman v. WinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Butler v. General Electric Credit Corp. (In Re Butler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  5. Butler v. TilghmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API